Elson, L.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3013-8030
(2019)
Can Streumer simply avoid supervenience?
Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 16 (3).
pp. 259-267.
ISSN 1559-3061
doi: 10.26556/jesp.v16i3.508
Abstract/Summary
In his defence of an error theory for normative judgements, Bart Streumer presents a new 'reduction' argument against nonreductive normative realism. Streumer claims that unlike previous versions, his 'simple moral theory' version of the argument doesn’t rely on the supervenience of the normative on the descriptive. But this is incorrect; without supervenience the argument does not succeed.
Altmetric Badge
Dimensions Badge
| Item Type | Article |
| URI | https://reading-pure-test.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/82679 |
| Identification Number/DOI | 10.26556/jesp.v16i3.508 |
| Refereed | Yes |
| Divisions | Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy |
| Download/View statistics | View download statistics for this item |
University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record
Download
Download