Causation, remoteness and the concept of the “overwhelming supervening act”: R v Grant [2021] EWCA Crim 1243

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Krebs, B. (2022) Causation, remoteness and the concept of the “overwhelming supervening act”: R v Grant [2021] EWCA Crim 1243. Journal of Criminal Law, 86 (1). pp. 42-45. ISSN 0022-0183 doi: 10.1177/00220183221077261

Abstract/Summary

This is a case commentary on R v Grant [2021] EWCA Crim 1243. It considers the concept of ‘overwhelming supervening act’ (OSA) and its relationship to the concepts of causation, remoteness and the so-called ‘fundamental difference rule’ (FDR).

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-pure-test.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/102408
Identification Number/DOI 10.1177/00220183221077261
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Central Services
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record