Work and life: the relative importance of job quality for general well-being, and implications for social surveys

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Green, F., Lee, S., Zou, M. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1095-1489 and Zhou, Y. (2024) Work and life: the relative importance of job quality for general well-being, and implications for social surveys. Socio-Economic Review, 22 (2). pp. 835-857. ISSN 1475-1461 doi: 10.1093/ser/mwae002

Abstract/Summary

We investigate the relative importance of variations in job quality in accounting for variations in general well-being among employed people in Europe, the United States, Australia and South Korea. We find that the importance of job quality is everywhere of a similar magnitude to that of health, while both are far more important than other conventional determinants, including education, gender, marital status, parental status, age, or household income. Job quality accounts for somewhat more of well-being’s variation among men than among women. Within the majority of European countries, the R-squared for the variation accounted for ranges between 14 and 19 percent. The paper’s findings, alongside rising policy interest, support the allocation of a greater priority for job quality in general socio-economic and labour force surveys than hitherto.

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-pure-test.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/114649
Identification Number/DOI 10.1093/ser/mwae002
Refereed Yes
Divisions Henley Business School > International Business and Strategy
Central Services
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record