Measures of functional, real-world communication for aphasia: a critical review

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Doedens, W. J. and Meteyard, L. (2020) Measures of functional, real-world communication for aphasia: a critical review. Aphasiology, 34 (4). pp. 492-514. ISSN 0268-7038 doi: 10.1080/02687038.2019.1702848

Abstract/Summary

Purpose: Aphasia is a language impairment caused by acquired brain damage such as stroke. For successful rehabilitation, a thorough understanding of naturalistic, real-world communication is imperative, as this is the behaviour speech and language therapy (SLT) ultimately aims to improve. In the field of aphasiology, there currently is a lack of consensus about the way in which communication should be measured. Underlying this is a fundamental lack of agreement over what real-world communication entails and how it should be defined. Method: In this critical review, we review the instruments that are currently used to quantify functional, real-world communication in people with aphasia (PWA). Each measure is checked against a newly proposed, comprehensive, theoretical framework of situated language use, which defines communication as: (1) interactive, (2) multimodal, and (3) based on context (common ground). Results: The instrument that best fits the theoretical definition of situated language use and allows for the quantification of communicative ability is the Scenario Test. Conclusions: This article provides a start in a more systematic and theoretically founded approach to the study and measurement of functional, real-world communication in aphasia. More work is needed to develop an instrument that can quantify communicative ability across different aphasia types and severities.

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-pure-test.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/87816
Identification Number/DOI 10.1080/02687038.2019.1702848
Refereed Yes
Divisions Central Services
Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Clinical Language Sciences
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record