Borderline cases and the collapsing principle

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Elson, L. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3013-8030 (2014) Borderline cases and the collapsing principle. Utilitas, 26 (1). pp. 51-60. ISSN 0953-8208 doi: 10.1017/S095382081300023X

Abstract/Summary

John Broome has argued that value incommensurability is vagueness, by appeal to a controversial ‘collapsing principle’ about comparative indeterminacy. I offer a new counterexample to the collapsing principle. That principle allows us to derive an outright contradiction from the claim that some object is a borderline case of some predicate. But if there are no borderline cases, then the principle is empty. The collapsing principle is either false or empty.

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-pure-test.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/39644
Identification Number/DOI 10.1017/S095382081300023X
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Humanities > Philosophy
Central Services
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record