Morality, risk-taking and psychopathic tendencies: an empirical study

Full text not archived in this repository.

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email

Cacace, S., Simons-Rudolph, J. and Dubljević, V. (2022) Morality, risk-taking and psychopathic tendencies: an empirical study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. 834734. ISSN 1664-1078 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.834734

Abstract/Summary

Research in empirical moral psychology has consistently found negative correlations between morality and both risk-taking, as well as psychopathic tendencies. However, prior research did not sufficiently explore intervening or moderating factors. Additionally, prior measures of moral preference (e.g., sacrificial dilemmas) have a pronounced lack of ecological validity. This study seeks to address these two gaps in the literature. First, this study used Preference for Precepts Implied in Moral Theories (PPIMT), which offers a novel, more nuanced and ecologically valid measure of moral judgment. Second, the current study examined if risk taking moderates the relationships between psychopathic tendencies and moral judgment. Results indicated that models which incorporated risk-taking as a moderator between psychopathic tendencies and moral judgment were a better fit to the data than those that incorporated psychopathic tendencies and risk-taking as exogenous variables, suggesting that the association between psychopathic tendencies and moral judgment is influenced by level of risk-taking. Therefore, future research investigating linkages between psychopathic tendencies and moral precepts may do well to incorporate risk-taking and risky behaviors to further strengthen the understanding of moral judgment in these individuals.

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-pure-test.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/128475
Identification Number/DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.834734
Refereed Yes
Divisions Life Sciences > School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences > Department of Psychology
Central Services
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record