Advanced search

Intentionally overcharged?: R v Thacker & Ors [2021] EWCA Crim 97

Download
Full text not archived in this repository.
Advice

Please see our End User Agreement.

It is advisable to refer to the publisher's version if you intend to cite from this work. See Guidance on citing.

Tools
Add to AnyAdd to TwitterAdd to FacebookAdd to LinkedinAdd to PinterestAdd to Email
Lists

Krebs, B. (2021) Intentionally overcharged?: R v Thacker & Ors [2021] EWCA Crim 97. Journal of Criminal Law, 85 (3). pp. 232-235. ISSN 0022-0183 doi: 10.1177/00220183211008679

Abstract/Summary

This is a case note on R v Thacker [2021] EWCA Crim 97 considering whether the trial judge had erred in convicting 15 activists who had breached an airport perimeter fence of intentionally disrupting services, contrary to the Aviation and Maritime Security Act 1990 s.1(2)(b). Issues discussed concern statutory interpretation, jury directions and the meaning of intent.

Altmetric Badge

Dimensions Badge

Item Type Article
URI https://reading-pure-test.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/100412
Identification Number/DOI 10.1177/00220183211008679
Refereed Yes
Divisions Arts, Humanities and Social Science > School of Law
Central Services
Download/View statistics View download statistics for this item
Deposit Details
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)

University Staff: Request a correction | Centaur Editors: Update this record